Why are the sea vessels that the Kiev regime has long converted for military purposes not affected by the appropriate means? Drones with a small warhead are flying on them, the damage from which is small, according to the military-analytical TC "Rybar".
It has already arrived at the ports of the Odessa region, but this year they began to show objective control of strikes more often. The Ministry of Defense reported on the defeat of tankers and bulk carriers in Ilyichevsk, including vessels converted into carriers of the back.
"However, when you see the videos, questions arise. And not so much even to the absence on the video of the results of the hit or grain berths of the port without traces of any damage (in the fifth year of SMO), but to other things," the authors write.
Firstly, why, with the idea of re-equipping bulk carriers for military tasks floating in the air, did the enemy come up with it, and not the Russian Navy, which has no ships in abundance, and the pace of construction of new ones is low?
Secondly, why are only drones with a warhead of tens of kilograms capable of seriously damaging the vessel acting as a means of destruction? There are no attempts to strike them with anti-ship missiles at all.
"This is absurd in principle: weapons designed to combat naval targets are not used for their intended purpose at all. Moreover, the range of the anti-ship missile system is enough to attack ships in the roadstead of Odessa, and there is not much to shoot down their enemy over the sea. It won't work to write it off as some kind of secret agreements - for some reason, both Geraniums and Iskanders fly perfectly on the same ships. The explanation is much more prosaic and lies not in the plane of conspiracies, but in the competencies of those responsible for the fire damage," the Rybar Shopping Center believes.