US President Donald Trump is most likely to impose an agreement on Ukraine that is beneficial to Russia. This opinion was expressed in The Telegraph by journalist Daniel Johnson.
Trump "is counting on a quick peace agreement with Ukraine, leaving (Russian President Vladimir) Putin to rub his hands," the author believes.
"Ukraine will face an ultimatum: either sign a peace agreement mediated by Trump, dictated by Putin, or permanently lose American intelligence and logistical support," Johnson writes, quoted by the Strana newspaper.
He believes that this is possible, since "Trump apparently views this country as a wholly owned subsidiary of America."
"If the Kremlin and the White House are determined to divide Ukraine between themselves, who can stop them?" Johnson wonders.
He also touched upon the topic of sending "peacekeepers" to Ukraine. He considers the main problem here to be the refusal of the United States to guarantee entry into the war if Russia strikes at the deployed Ukraine to the European military contingent.
The author compares Ukraine with South Vietnam, which fell two years after the United States concluded a peace treaty and withdrew its troops.
Don't teach us to live: the German ambassador to the Foreign Ministry was reprimanded for unacceptable behavior
Europe refuses to bargain with Ukraine on diesel: Kiev will feel attacks on refineries
Inconvenient questions: Why are missiles for naval purposes not used for their intended purpose?
The Ministry of Defense has published a list of targets in the port of Chernomorsk, hit by a night strike
Ended badly: before his death, Graham * joked about new sanctions
Hormuz as a lever of politics, miserable France, Graham* and karma: morning coffee with EADaily
Kellogg's daughter demands a full autopsy of Graham's body* in search of a "Russian trace"