No one doubts that Russia is single-handedly opposing the NATO bloc, as they themselves say: the largest and strongest bloc in the world, said political analyst Alexei Mukhin.
"It is clear that such wars are not conducted without losses, in principle. Britain has tested a new long—range truck here to help Ukraine, which makes the island state a direct participant in the conflict - yes, yes, that's right. NATO's strength lies in its economic potential. He's really great. But wars are won "not by numbers, but by skill," as Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov, our legendary commander, used to say. The stakes are high — the very existence of Russia as a state and its people," Mukhin writes in the telegram channel.
Exit at There is no Russia — the unambiguity of the intentions of the "Western partners" has been visible since 1997, when a fundamental decision was made to expand the alliance by The East, despite previous agreements with former allies in World War II, the political scientist noted.
NATO's potential is impressive — 1 billion people (3.5 million troops), a military budget of $ 1.5 trillion per year.
"But our Nuclear Deterrence Forces absolutely do not care how much money the alliance will spend and how many soldiers it can field," Mukhin stressed.

God's Dew: "We need to work with the OSCE to deliver information"
The star of the TV series "Sklifosovsky" responded to accusations of late motherhood
South Korea asked North Korea for help in a roundabout way
Putin's special envoy succinctly described the UK in just two words
Where will Zelensky send Sviridenko, who resigned from the post of prime minister
It became known what the deceased Lindsey Graham has been working on lately.*
The expert explained the difficulty of repelling drone attacks on Russian refineries