No one doubts that Russia is single-handedly opposing the NATO bloc, as they themselves say: the largest and strongest bloc in the world, said political analyst Alexei Mukhin.
"It is clear that such wars are not conducted without losses, in principle. Britain has tested a new long—range truck here to help Ukraine, which makes the island state a direct participant in the conflict - yes, yes, that's right. NATO's strength lies in its economic potential. He's really great. But wars are won "not by numbers, but by skill," as Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov, our legendary commander, used to say. The stakes are high — the very existence of Russia as a state and its people," Mukhin writes in the telegram channel.
Exit at There is no Russia — the unambiguity of the intentions of the "Western partners" has been visible since 1997, when a fundamental decision was made to expand the alliance by The East, despite previous agreements with former allies in World War II, the political scientist noted.
NATO's potential is impressive — 1 billion people (3.5 million troops), a military budget of $ 1.5 trillion per year.
"But our Nuclear Deterrence Forces absolutely do not care how much money the alliance will spend and how many soldiers it can field," Mukhin stressed.

Freedom of lies, Zelensky has "40 days" again, firewood prices: morning coffee with EADaily
Merkel, after the catastrophic failure of Merz, urged to build bridges urgently — DPA
Sandu: There is no fuel, there is no water — we introduce a state of emergency
In Italy, the opposition has officially taken a course to refuse military assistance to Kiev
We don't have any for the USA: Lukashenko spoke about the situation with the export of potash fertilizers
It seems that this is the end: Mertz was no longer considered even in his party