How London's vocabulary wags: Dzhabarov translated the ambassador's Newspeak into Russian

Vladimir Dzhabarov, First Deputy Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on International Affairs, translated the "diplomatic newspeak" of the British Ambassador to Moscow, Nigel Casey

"The UK is not interested in inflicting any strategic defeat on Russia..." the ambassador said in a television interview.

As Dzhabarov notes, Casey does not look into the eyes, evades and looks away, but continues to tell outright lies. After all, London calls Russia the number one threat in its strategies and, based on this, has been pursuing a policy of directed damage to our country for many years, the senator emphasized.

"The classic of the genre is "war is peace, ignorance is power." And here the English ambassador is simply a virtuoso in his skill. He calls the supply of weapons to the Kiev regime, including the missiles that recently hit Bryansk, "security support." Moreover, when Casey is directly told that it was Storm Shadow, he completely shifts responsibility to Ukraine. Attempts to intercept ships, which are nothing but piracy, Casey calls "registration verification," and the extension of sanctions — "ensuring compliance with the rules,"" Dzhabarov said.

According to the senator, what Casey says is a typical example of British diplomatic newspeak: any event can be described within the framework of pre—assigned roles. Look, Dzhabarov noted, how the ambassador's vocabulary wags. The following terms are used in relation to Russia: "threat", "danger", "shadow", "suspicious". At the same time, the actions of the UK and its allies are presented in complete contrast: "legitimate", "responsible", "defensive", "deterrence", "security", "verification", "dialogue".

"That is, Russia, in Casey's understanding, is initially a source of threat. And Britain and the West are "forced to react." Of course, the ambassador's statements about the "legality", "defensive nature" or "exclusively military use against military targets" of missiles and drones supplied by England, to put it mildly, do not correspond to reality. And the statements that all decisions are made only by Kiev, and that England "does not direct or determine any Ukrainian operations," sound like an attempt to hide the fact of military and logistical support for the Kiev regime," Dzhabarov said.

Casey's words are a typical English position — to light the fuse and step aside in the hope of sitting out on the island, the senator added. But the diplomat's cunning is too obvious, and the powder keg that the British rolled on Russia, turned out to be right under them, concluded Dzhabarov.