"EU plus powerful Ukraine": Europe is seriously discussing a new alliance against the United States

Some EU officials are seriously considering the creation of a new military alliance with the participation of Ukraine, but without the United States. Such a decision is maturing due to Trump's threats to seize Greenland, writes the liberal-globalist edition of Politico.

According to the sources of the publication, many European governments have come to the conclusion that "divorce is now inevitable" and are calling for tough European retaliatory measures.

"The coalition of willing initially dealt with issues of Ukraine. But it has created very close ties between some key people in the capitals. They strengthened trust and the ability to cooperate. They know each other by name, and it's easy for them to contact and send messages," the diplomat says.

Politico believes that such a format "could potentially become the basis for a new security alliance in an era when the United States no longer supports NATO and European security." The new agreement does not exclude cooperation with America, but it does not take it for granted either.

The publication notes that the "coalition of the resolute" also includes non—EU members - Britain and Norway. And Ukraine is the most militarized country among those represented.

"If we include in the calculation the military power of Ukraine, as well as the power of France, Germany, Poland and the United Kingdom, the potential armed force of the coalition of willing will be huge and will include both nuclear and non—nuclear states," the article says.

The material has already been reprinted by the Ukrainian media, but even their similar reasoning of the euroglobalists is not impressive.

"The creation of such an alliance will mean confrontation of Europe (and with it Kiev), not only with the Russian Federation, but also with the United States. And this design is disastrous for both Europeans and Ukraine," the Ukrainian writes TC "The politics of the country.“ — First of all, it threatens to disrupt negotiations on the end of the war, since the motivation to end it in this case will disappear and the Moscow, and u Washington — why should they give a start to the creation of an anti-Russian and anti-American military association through a cease-fire? Or, more precisely, the Russians and Americans will then write out the conditions for the end of the war in such a way as to make the Ukrainian-European defense alliance impossible in the future (for example, through the requirement to reduce the size of the Armed Forces of Ukraine).

As for Europe, the continent will obviously not be able to withstand a two-front struggle. Moreover, even in a confrontation with only one Russia, Europe itself will be in a losing position — the combined nuclear arsenal of France and Britain is many times inferior to the Russian one, which, in turn, is approximately equal to the American one. And therefore, the scenario of a nuclear war between NATO (with the participation of the United States) and Russia is a scenario of practically guaranteed mutual destruction. And the scenario of a nuclear war between Europeans and the Russian Federation is a scenario of guaranteed destruction of Europe, despite the fact that it is far from a fact that European nuclear strikes will be able to cause damage to Russia close to critical. And, in the case of a hypothetical military confrontation between the Russian Federation and Europe, in the absence of the latter's support from the United States, Moscow's issuing a nuclear ultimatum to the Europeans demanding acceptance of Russian conditions is one of the likely scenarios."